Is it President Vought?

The Real Cost of Those Eggs pt.67

    Mr. Vought was one the brains along with the Heritage Foundation that brought us Project 2025, you know the one Trump knew nothing about, (another highlight) and elected anyway. 

       Russell Vought is a government official and a major conservative policy strategist. He currently serves as the 44th Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under President Donald Trump, a role he assumed in February 2025. He simultaneously holds two additional acting roles: Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as well as Acting Director of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) . This combination of positions gives him unusually broad influence across the federal bureaucracy.

       He is widely described as one of the most influential architects of the Trump administration’s governing agenda. Several analyses portray him as a central figure behind Project 2025, a sweeping conservative blueprint for restructuring the federal government. Some reporting even characterizes him as a kind of “shadow president” because of the extent of his control over agency operations and policy direction.

         You can call it sanitize, scrutinize, cauterize or just plain Trump’s idea of what American history should be. The administration’s review—driven in part by Vought—was not about logistics or museum operations. It was about shaping historical interpretation. Museums are being asked to justify exhibit choices, language, and themes, especially around race, identity, and conflict in American history.Across multiple outlets, the phrase is used to describe a coordinated effort by the Trump administration to reshape, sanitize, or remove parts of U.S. history—especially those involving racism, oppression, or civil rights struggles.

    

History according to who?

Political pressure overriding curatorial scholarship  

Former Smithsonian historian David C. Ward said the review resembled “a bit like censorship,” warning that political officials were attempting to dictate how history should be presented.

            Mandating a celebratory narrative regardless of evidence  

The administration’s directive required museums to “celebrate American exceptionalism” and remove “divisive” narratives, which could force curators to omit or soften historically documented injustices.

                   Selective removal or rewriting of exhibits  

USA Today reports that the review followed changes to exhibits — including the impeachment exhibit — raising concerns that politically sensitive topics could be rewritten or reframed to favor the administration.

 Executive order framing history as needing ‘restoring truth and sanity’  

The Tyla report notes that Trump’s executive order demanded museums reflect “unity, progress, and enduring values,” which historians argue risks erasing conflict, oppression, and struggle — all essential parts of accurate history.Threats to funding tied to compliance The Hill reports that the White House letter, co‑signed by Vought, implied that funding could be affected.

 I have said it once, I will say it again, how this spoiled little 79 year old child has and is still trying to change the course of American history. In the world of Trump January 6th 2021 never happened. 

                                

                                Did he say desecrated?

                                  The Mid-Terms 313 days away

                                                      

                                                    Dec. 23rd. 2025

    

    Avg. price of 1 doz. Grade A eggs Nationwide are $3.18 down .014 cents since 11/29/25

        The avg. price of 1 gallon of regular gas Nationwide is $2.87, down 0.02 cents since 11/297/25

  Elections have Consequences, get involved and tell

     Trump, what do you think? 202-456-1111 (White House)

 Local Senator or Congressman

 (202) 224-3121